First and foremost, I would like to clarify that I take my responsibilities as an admin very seriously. I have always prioritized fair play, evidence-based decisions, and community integrity over personal feelings or rivalries. Unfortunately, the report made by Frewp is a misrepresentation of both the incident in question and my behavior as an admin.
Let me go point-by-point to address and debunk his claims.
1. False Accusations of Threats and Power AbuseFrewp claims I said, "Post a video or I will ban you right now," and "Admit or I will ban you." This is a clear fabrication. What I actually said was conditional and based on game rules enforcement, not personal threats:
"If you don't admit your mistake or post a video, I will ban your RPG usage, not you personally."
This was a rule-specific warning, not admin abuse. My actions are always directed at enforcing rules fairly, not penalizing individuals without cause. Frewp deliberately twisted this into a personal threat to frame me as abusive.
2. The "CR Incident" – Lack of Proof and Proper ResponseThe issue started when Frewp used an RPG in what appeared to be close range combat (CR), which is against the server rules. Multiple players witnessed it and began questioning the act. In fact, I was not the first to raise suspicion – Wizz, Traphole and others were already debating whether it was CR. I joined the discussion after players flagged it, and asked Frewp for his POV video (as we often request in such situations). No video was posted, and no clear denial or justification was provided.
I did not ban Frewp. Instead, I made a game-impacting correction by re-adding the player (3more) who was likely killed unfairly through CR. This was done without punishing Frewp, since direct proof was lacking – a decision Frewp conveniently ignores. This alone contradicts his claim of “abuse.”
I didn’t ban him, rpg-warn him, or kick him. I only restored fairness in the round by adding back the player he had potentially eliminated unfairly.
If anything, I exercised restraint and caution – not abuse.
3. Distorted Context and Biased NarrativeFrewp frames the conversation as if the entire situation was started by me due to some personal vendetta. This is patently false. Players like Wizz and Traphole were already talking about the CR. Blitz himself said, “I don’t think it was CR”, which shows multiple viewpoints were represented, and no one was blindly agreeing with me. It was a community discussion, not an admin witch-hunt.
He also conveniently ignores his own past – a repeated history of borderline or direct rule-breaking behavior:
He recently attempted a CR-RPG on JeFFy inside the Demolition building. The only reason no action was taken was because the explosion missed. Even then, players flagged it. I personally witnessed that and chose not to act because there were no visible consequences.
If I had any bias or power-abuse intentions, I could have punished him then, but I didn’t. That proves I make my decisions maturely and based on context – not grudges.
4. False Claims About My Use of Personal InsultsAnother serious and baseless claim is that I mentioned his mother's real name and used her as an insult. That’s an outright lie. I used the generic word "mother", in a sarcastic reply after he said he’d report me. No personal name was used, and I did not attack his family in any manner.
Screenshots like
https://ibb.co/FLWxvvKM do not show any proof of me using a real name or making a personal insult – they only show his exaggerated interpretation of my words.
If you falsely accuse someone of a personal attack, you should back it with unedited, clear proof, not assumptions or twisted quotes.
5. Accusation of Game ManipulationHis claim that I "changed the course of the game" by adding back 3more is ironic, because:
I added 3more after a disputed RPG kill.
I didn’t remove or punish Frewp at all.
3more went on to perform well, yes – but the fairness of his re-entry was based on the suspicion of a rule-break, not favoritism.
If Frewp believes adding back a player unfairly tilted the round, he should provide proof that the original kill was clean – which he failed to do.
6. Contradiction in His Own Story: The "Remote Grenade" ExcuseOne of the biggest blunders in Frewp’s report is his claim that the kill on 3more was caused by a teammate’s remote grenade. He never mentioned this in-game — not even once — during or after the incident. It’s only in his forum report that this magical explanation appears out of thin air.
Let me be clear:
In-game, he offered no defense or mention of a remote grenade.
No teammate claimed they used one.
No proof has been provided to support this retroactive excuse.
This inconsistency speaks volumes. It’s not a defense — it’s a desperate attempt to rewrite the past after realizing his RPG usage looked like CR. And again: no video was posted, despite multiple requests.
ALL IN ALLFrewp’s report is not a call for justice – it’s a retaliation because he was publicly questioned and couldn’t provide a solid defense.
His approach throughout the incident has been:
Distorting admin statements
Exaggerating conversations
Twisting context
Ignoring his own history
I did not take action against him because of personal dislike. I took minimal corrective action in the round without banning or punishing him, and I never used personal insults or broke admin conduct rules.
This is not power abuse. This is called being responsible.
I leave it to the senior staff and community to review this matter fairly. I’m open to any investigation and will continue performing my duties with integrity, even when falsely accused.
p.s I asked wizz, traphole and 3more to reply here in this report because 3more was directly involved in the incident and rest were the witnesses.
