Don't play victim. You're saying that Traphole and Wizz would go against you no matter what but the point is that did I do what they asked me to do? No. I didn't rpg-ban or even remove you from the round, so don't be a dick and exaggerate things just for the sake of getting me punished.
I added 3more back in the round and THAT IS THE ONLY THING THAT HAPPENED NOTHING ELSE.
Anyways I feel like it's pointless to even reply to your childish accusations, so I will just leave it to the management.

First and foremost, I would like to clarify that I take my responsibilities as an admin very seriously. I have always prioritized fair play, evidence-based decisions, and community integrity over personal feelings or rivalries. Unfortunately, the report made by Frewp is a misrepresentation of both the incident in question and my behavior as an admin.

Let me go point-by-point to address and debunk his claims.

1. False Accusations of Threats and Power Abuse
Frewp claims I said, "Post a video or I will ban you right now," and "Admit or I will ban you." This is a clear fabrication. What I actually said was conditional and based on game rules enforcement, not personal threats:

"If you don't admit your mistake or post a video, I will ban your RPG usage, not you personally."

This was a rule-specific warning, not admin abuse. My actions are always directed at enforcing rules fairly, not penalizing individuals without cause. Frewp deliberately twisted this into a personal threat to frame me as abusive.

2. The "CR Incident" – Lack of Proof and Proper Response
The issue started when Frewp used an RPG in what appeared to be close range combat (CR), which is against the server rules. Multiple players witnessed it and began questioning the act. In fact, I was not the first to raise suspicion – Wizz, Traphole and others were already debating whether it was CR. I joined the discussion after players flagged it, and asked Frewp for his POV video (as we often request in such situations). No video was posted, and no clear denial or justification was provided.

I did not ban Frewp. Instead, I made a game-impacting correction by re-adding the player (3more) who was likely killed unfairly through CR. This was done without punishing Frewp, since direct proof was lacking – a decision Frewp conveniently ignores. This alone contradicts his claim of "abuse."

I didn't ban him, rpg-warn him, or kick him. I only restored fairness in the round by adding back the player he had potentially eliminated unfairly.

If anything, I exercised restraint and caution – not abuse.

3. Distorted Context and Biased Narrative
Frewp frames the conversation as if the entire situation was started by me due to some personal vendetta. This is patently false. Players like Wizz and Traphole were already talking about the CR. Blitz himself said, "I don't think it was CR", which shows multiple viewpoints were represented, and no one was blindly agreeing with me. It was a community discussion, not an admin witch-hunt.

He also conveniently ignores his own past – a repeated history of borderline or direct rule-breaking behavior:

He recently attempted a CR-RPG on JeFFy inside the Demolition building. The only reason no action was taken was because the explosion missed. Even then, players flagged it. I personally witnessed that and chose not to act because there were no visible consequences.

If I had any bias or power-abuse intentions, I could have punished him then, but I didn't. That proves I make my decisions maturely and based on context – not grudges.

4. False Claims About My Use of Personal Insults
Another serious and baseless claim is that I mentioned his mother's real name and used her as an insult. That's an outright lie. I used the generic word "mother", in a sarcastic reply after he said he'd report me. No personal name was used, and I did not attack his family in any manner.

Screenshots like https://ibb.co/FLWxvvKM do not show any proof of me using a real name or making a personal insult – they only show his exaggerated interpretation of my words.

If you falsely accuse someone of a personal attack, you should back it with unedited, clear proof, not assumptions or twisted quotes.

5. Accusation of Game Manipulation
His claim that I "changed the course of the game" by adding back 3more is ironic, because:

I added 3more after a disputed RPG kill.

I didn't remove or punish Frewp at all.

3more went on to perform well, yes – but the fairness of his re-entry was based on the suspicion of a rule-break, not favoritism.

If Frewp believes adding back a player unfairly tilted the round, he should provide proof that the original kill was clean – which he failed to do.

6. Contradiction in His Own Story: The "Remote Grenade" Excuse
One of the biggest blunders in Frewp's report is his claim that the kill on 3more was caused by a teammate's remote grenade. He never mentioned this in-game — not even once — during or after the incident. It's only in his forum report that this magical explanation appears out of thin air.

Let me be clear:

In-game, he offered no defense or mention of a remote grenade.

No teammate claimed they used one.

No proof has been provided to support this retroactive excuse.

This inconsistency speaks volumes. It's not a defense — it's a desperate attempt to rewrite the past after realizing his RPG usage looked like CR. And again: no video was posted, despite multiple requests.



ALL IN ALL
Frewp's report is not a call for justice – it's a retaliation because he was publicly questioned and couldn't provide a solid defense.

His approach throughout the incident has been:

Distorting admin statements

Exaggerating conversations

Twisting context

Ignoring his own history

I did not take action against him because of personal dislike. I took minimal corrective action in the round without banning or punishing him, and I never used personal insults or broke admin conduct rules.

This is not power abuse. This is called being responsible.

I leave it to the senior staff and community to review this matter fairly. I'm open to any investigation and will continue performing my duties with integrity, even when falsely accused.

p.s I asked wizz, traphole and 3more to reply here in this report because 3more was directly involved in the incident and rest were the witnesses.

Current Nickname:[VU]MD619
Previous Nicknames:[NYB]MD619, [NYB]RDX, [ON]MD619, Eagle(vcmp 0.3)
Age:24
Country/Timezone:Pakistan|GMT +5:00
How many hours do you spend in VCAD a day?depends upon player count, if there are players I usually play till everyone quits.
Administrative Experience:RTV Admin Associate, Asian City Moderator, Vccnr Admin in 0.3, and forgot some because my vcmp journey has been long.
Why do you want to be a part of our staff?:As it is the time vcmp is experiencing all time low player count and most of the old experienced players have either completely quit or gone for prolonged inactivity so I realised remaining active servers of vcmp need active admins who can regularly check and help out players and keep an eye on rule-breakers and cheaters. There has been variety of latest cheats being used and distributed among vcmp players such as Aurora, wep.dat and doomhack etc. For recognition of players using these cheats active admins are needed so I consider myself knowledgeable about this and thus have showed interest in administrating VCAD.
Additional Information:thanks

Accepted as Moderator.

Nickname: [VU]MD619
Average Ping in VCAD: 200
Location: Pakistan
Timezone (GMT +/-): GMT+5
Discord: MD619#3530